Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL220
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
95 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced February 2020
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 169g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Announced August 2009
- Also Known as ST500
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL220 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL220, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and TL220 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-70 was released 10 years later than the TL220 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the WG-70 matches up against the TL220 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL220 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-70 & Samsung TL220. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Samsung TL220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung TL220
| WG-70 | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2020 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 128 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL220 over the Ricoh WG-70
| TL220 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL220
| WG-70 | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL220 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-70 enjoys physical dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL220 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 169 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL220 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the WG-70 compared to the TL220.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and TL220 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL220 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by reviewing technical specs. The visual below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-70 and TL220.
As you can tell, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-70 to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The newer WG-70 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL220 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL220 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung TL220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung TL220 |
| Also called | - | ST500 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2020-02-04 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lb) | 169 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $280 | $90 |