Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX10
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
80 Imaging
55 Features
50 Overall
53
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Launched April 2010
- Renewed by Samsung NX11
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX10 Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX10, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the NX10 (15MP) is very similar but the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and NX10 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-M1 was announced 4 years after the NX10 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the WG-M1 scores vs the NX10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX10 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX10. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Samsung NX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung NX10
| WG-M1 | NX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | April 2010 | Newer by 54 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX10 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| NX10 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+499k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX10
| WG-M1 | NX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX10 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys outer dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX10 has dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") having a weight of 499 grams (1.10 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX10 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the WG-M1 and the NX10.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and NX10 is 91 and 80 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specifications. The picture below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and NX10.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The WG-M1 with its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Samsung NX10 will offer greater detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX10 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung NX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung NX10 |
| Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2010-04-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | DRIM Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Total lenses | - | 32 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 1.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 920 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 11.00 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lb) | 499 gr (1.10 lb) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 572 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | 400 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | BP1130 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $2,000 | $626 |