Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX1
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
67 Imaging
32 Features
36 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 544g - 115 x 83 x 92mm
- Introduced April 2009
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX1 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony HX1, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and HX1 (9MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and HX1 (1/2.4") use different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-M1 was revealed 5 years after the HX1 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the WG-M1 matches up against the HX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony HX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony HX1
WG-M1 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2014 | April 2009 | More modern by 66 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX1 over the Ricoh WG-M1
HX1 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 115k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony HX1
WG-M1 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX1 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 provides exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony HX1 has dimensions of 115mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 544 grams (1.20 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony HX1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-M1 vs the HX1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and HX1 is 91 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by checking technical specs. The picture underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and HX1.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-M1 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-M1 will resolve extra detail because of its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The fresher WG-M1 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX1 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2009-04-22 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 9MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | (1×) | 28-560mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 1.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 9.20 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1440x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lbs) | 544g (1.20 lbs) |
Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 115 x 83 x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-65 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $2,000 | $47,999 |