Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX7V
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
![Ricoh WG-M1 front Ricoh WG-M1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-M1/Ricoh-WG-M1-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX7V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX7V front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-HX7V/Sony-HX7V-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX7V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 208g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX7V Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX7V, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the HX7V (16MP) is very close and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The WG-M1 was revealed 3 years after the HX7V which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short summary of how the WG-M1 scores against the HX7V with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX7V Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX7V. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony HX7V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony HX7V
WG-M1 | HX7V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2014 | ![]() | July 2011 | Newer by 39 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX7V over the Ricoh WG-M1
HX7V | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper display (+806k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony HX7V
WG-M1 | HX7V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX7V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys exterior dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony HX7V has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX7V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the HX7V.
![Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX7V size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX7V size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-WG-M1-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-HX7V-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and HX7V is 91 and 92 respectively.
![Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX7V top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX7V top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-WG-M1-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-HX7V-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX7V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and HX7V.
As you have seen, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Sony HX7V to result in greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics more aggressively. The more recent WG-M1 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX7V sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX7V sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Ricoh-WG-M1-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-HX7V-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX7V Screen and ViewFinder
![Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX7V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX7V Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-WG-M1-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-HX7V-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX7V Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX7V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX7V |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | (1×) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 115k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | XtraFine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.80 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lbs) | 208g (0.46 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $2,000 | $499 |