Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX1
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4e12/b4e122b2aaa28d2f9d004ee8fcbd6e8de420bece" alt="Samsung MV800 front Samsung MV800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04a1f/04a1f3ad992de867dcbb3b964aee0d2661adec42" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 front"
79 Imaging
69 Features
57 Overall
64
Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Introduced September 2011
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Launched February 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX1 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Samsung MV800 versus Sony RX1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the MV800 (16MP) and RX1 (24MP) and the MV800 (1/2.3") and RX1 (Full frame) use totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The MV800 was released 17 months earlier than the RX1 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the MV800 grades against the RX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung MV800 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung MV800 Gallery and Sony RX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Sony RX1
MV800 | RX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Samsung MV800
RX1 | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2013 | ![]() | September 2011 | Fresher by 17 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung MV800 and Sony RX1
MV800 | RX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Samsung MV800 features external measurements of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sony RX1 has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") and a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Check out the Samsung MV800 versus Sony RX1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the MV800 vs the RX1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9974/c9974e07c9478e6b65367aaa20ea434646cf509c" alt="Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX1 size comparison Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX1 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the MV800 and RX1 is 97 and 79 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/929b5/929b5fae6bd37d78a86b3de29e79d900c11e958e" alt="Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX1 top view buttons comparison Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX1 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The visual underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the MV800 and RX1.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The MV800 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Sony RX1 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older MV800 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29589/29589e25b430cfca1345ae55a720178311a23aae" alt="Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX1 sensor size comparison Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX1 sensor size comparison"
Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4daaa/4daaa87b5fa8cd4ff5596ebfe3aa40b5a226a56e" alt="Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX1 Specifications
Samsung MV800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung MV800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-09-01 | 2013-02-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.0-22.0 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) | 482 grams (1.06 pounds) |
Dimensions | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 93 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2534 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 270 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP70 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Micro SD | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $499 | $2,798 |