Samsung WB250F vs Sony NEX-F3
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Samsung WB250F vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-C3
- Replacement is Sony NEX-3N
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung WB250F vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Samsung WB250F vs Sony NEX-F3, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB250F (14MP) and the NEX-F3 (16MP) is very well matched but the WB250F (1/2.3") and NEX-F3 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WB250F was revealed 5 months after the NEX-F3 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the WB250F scores vs the NEX-F3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung WB250F vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB250F & Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The full galleries are available at Samsung WB250F Gallery & Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Sony NEX-F3
| WB250F | NEX-F3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Samsung WB250F
| NEX-F3 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB250F and Sony NEX-F3
| WB250F | NEX-F3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | August 2012 | Similar age |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Samsung WB250F vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB250F has got exterior measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Sony NEX-F3 has dimensions of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Check the Samsung WB250F vs Sony NEX-F3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the WB250F vs the NEX-F3.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB250F and NEX-F3 is 93 and 86 respectively.
Samsung WB250F vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through technical specs. The image below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WB250F and NEX-F3.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WB250F with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony NEX-F3 will resolve more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos way more aggressively.
Samsung WB250F vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung WB250F vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
| Samsung WB250F | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB250F | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2012-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226 grams (0.50 lb) | 314 grams (0.69 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 470 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $250 | $470 |