Samsung WB800F vs Samsung WB850F
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Samsung WB800F vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Launched January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung WB800F vs Samsung WB850F Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Samsung WB800F and Samsung WB850F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras and both are designed by Samsung. The resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the WB850F (16MP) is pretty close and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WB800F was revealed 13 months after the WB850F which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick summary of how the WB800F grades vs the WB850F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Samsung WB800F vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB800F & Samsung WB850F. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung WB850F
| WB800F | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 13 months |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Samsung WB800F
| WB850F | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Samsung WB850F
| WB800F | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung WB800F has physical measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB850F has sizing of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung WB800F and Samsung WB850F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the WB800F vs the WB850F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WB800F and WB850F is 92 and 91 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching specifications. The image underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WB800F and WB850F.
Plainly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution and you can expect comparable quality of pictures although you need to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The younger WB800F should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung WB800F vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung WB800F vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Samsung WB800F | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung WB800F | Samsung WB850F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 218g (0.48 pounds) | 250g (0.55 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $300 | $599 |