Sigma fp L vs Sigma Quattro
83 Imaging
82 Features
80 Overall
81
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22fa4/22fa4f4267f2bf7de01c140970235d67a3646dc1" alt="Sigma fp L front Sigma fp L front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57da5/57da55bc092010e6c2734595d664451750b4424f" alt="Sigma sd Quattro front Sigma sd Quattro front"
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Sigma fp L vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 61MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 427g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Revealed March 2021
- Earlier Model is Sigma fp
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sigma fp L vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Here is a comprehensive assessment of the Sigma fp L versus Sigma Quattro, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras and both of them are manufactured by Sigma. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the fp L (61MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the fp L (Full frame) and Quattro (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The fp L was announced 5 years later than the Quattro and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the fp L grades versus the Quattro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sigma fp L vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sigma fp L and Sigma sd Quattro. The whole galleries are viewable at Sigma fp L Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma fp L over the Sigma Quattro
fp L | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2021 | ![]() | February 2016 | Fresher by 62 months |
Display size | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 2100k | ![]() | 1620k | Crisper display (+480k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sigma fp L
Quattro | fp L |
---|
Common features in the Sigma fp L and Sigma Quattro
fp L | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Sigma fp L vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and size. The Sigma fp L features physical measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") with a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Compare the Sigma fp L versus Sigma Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the fp L compared to the Quattro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0c3c/e0c3c4a21231b85a96b7733c650b3a80a6ddbea5" alt="Sigma fp L vs Sigma Quattro size comparison Sigma fp L vs Sigma Quattro size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the fp L and Quattro is 83 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b6e7/5b6e78ee193dd94256bc147ee428706b66a7df63" alt="Sigma fp L vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison Sigma fp L vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison"
Sigma fp L vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing specifications. The photograph here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the fp L and Quattro.
To sum up, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The fp L with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Sigma fp L will provide you with extra detail with its extra 32MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The younger fp L provides an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3dabd/3dabdcc789e0242562908a464ce3e191af2fefdd" alt="Sigma fp L vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison Sigma fp L vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison"
Sigma fp L vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eaec3/eaec32ea57310cb28196241e445e59e5e3a5c1c3" alt="Sigma fp L vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Sigma fp L vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sigma fp L vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Sigma fp L | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Sigma | Sigma |
Model type | Sigma fp L | Sigma sd Quattro |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2021-03-25 | 2016-02-23 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 61 megapixels | 29 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 9520 x 6328 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 102400 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 6 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica L | Sigma SA |
Number of lenses | 40 | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 2,100k dots | 1,620k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,680k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.83x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 3.8 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | - |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB Power Delivery supported) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 427 gr (0.94 pounds) | 625 gr (1.38 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BP-51 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $2,499 | $738 |