Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370
78 Imaging
72 Features
59 Overall
66
94 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 34-238mm (F3.6-5.6) lens
- 179g - 100 x 57 x 26mm
- Launched January 2010
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370 Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Sigma Quattro H versus Sony W370, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Quattro H (45MP) and W370 (14MP) and the Quattro H (APS-H) and W370 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Quattro H was launched 6 years after the W370 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W370 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Quattro H matches up vs the W370 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Sigma sd Quattro H & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370. The complete galleries are provided at Sigma Quattro H Gallery & Sony W370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Sony W370
Quattro H | W370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | January 2010 | Newer by 75 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1620k | 230k | Crisper display (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W370 over the Sigma Quattro H
W370 | Quattro H |
---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro H and Sony W370
Quattro H | W370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Sigma Quattro H has outside dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony W370 has sizing of 100mm x 57mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Sigma Quattro H versus Sony W370 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the Quattro H versus the W370.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Quattro H and W370 is 78 and 94 respectively.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking a spec sheet. The image below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Quattro H and W370.
As you can see, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Quattro H because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Sigma Quattro H will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 31MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The fresher Quattro H will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
Model | Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Dual TRUE III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-H | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 26.6 x 17.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 476.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 45 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 6200 x 4152 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 34-238mm (7.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.6-5.6 |
Total lenses | 76 | - |
Crop factor | 1.4 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,620 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.8fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 179 grams (0.39 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 100 x 57 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP-61 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $1,134 | $230 |