Clicky

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370

Portability
78
Imaging
73
Features
59
Overall
67
Sigma sd Quattro H front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370 Key Specs

Sigma Quattro H
(Full Review)
  • 45MP - APS-H Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2016
Sony W370
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 34-238mm (F3.6-5.6) lens
  • 179g - 100 x 57 x 26mm
  • Launched January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370 Overview

The following is a in depth analysis of the Sigma Quattro H versus Sony W370, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Quattro H (45MP) and W370 (14MP) and the Quattro H (APS-H) and W370 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The Quattro H was launched 6 years after the W370 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W370 being a Compact camera.

Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Quattro H matches up vs the W370 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Sony W370

 Quattro H W370 
LaunchedFebruary 2016January 2010Newer by 75 months
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Display resolution1620k230kCrisper display (+1390k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W370 over the Sigma Quattro H

 W370 Quattro H 

Common features in the Sigma Quattro H and Sony W370

 Quattro H W370 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Sigma Quattro H has outside dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony W370 has sizing of 100mm x 57mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).

Examine the Sigma Quattro H versus Sony W370 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the Quattro H versus the W370.

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Quattro H and W370 is 78 and 94 respectively.

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370 top view buttons comparison

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking a spec sheet. The image below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Quattro H and W370.

As you can see, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Quattro H because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Sigma Quattro H will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 31MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The fresher Quattro H will have a benefit in sensor technology.

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370 sensor size comparison

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma Quattro H as a Portrait photography camera
Sony W370 as a Portrait photography camera
83
has manual focus
megapixel count amazing (45MP)
sensor size is good (APS-H)
includes face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
28
resolution is good (14MP)
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Sigma Quattro H
Street photography with Sony W370
70
sensor size is good (APS-H)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sigma Quattro H Sports photography information
Sony W370 Sports photography information
72
megapixel count amazing (45 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-H)
includes tracking focus
weather sealing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.8 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
35
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14MP)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Sigma Quattro H as a Travel photography camera
Sony W370 as a Travel photography camera
65
weather sealing
megapixel count amazing (45 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
58
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
no Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Sigma Quattro H
Landscape photography with Sony W370
75
has manual focus
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
nice screen size (3")
megapixel count amazing (45 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-H)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
lack of image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse recording
37
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma Quattro H Vlogging info
Sony W370 Vlogging info
26
includes face detect focus
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low ( pixels)
lack of mic port
25
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic jack
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W370 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma Quattro H and Sony W370
 Sigma sd Quattro HSony Cyber-shot DSC-W370
General Information
Manufacturer Sigma Sony
Model Sigma sd Quattro H Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2016-02-23 2010-01-07
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Dual TRUE III -
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-H 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 26.6 x 17.9mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 476.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 45 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 6200 x 4152 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Sigma SA fixed lens
Lens focal range - 34-238mm (7.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.6-5.6
Total lenses 76 -
Crop factor 1.4 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,620 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.73x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 seconds 2 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.8fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 5.00 m
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution - 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight - 179 grams (0.39 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") 100 x 57 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model BP-61 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $1,134 $230