Sigma Quattro vs Sony W320
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W320 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Sigma Quattro and Sony W320, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Sigma and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and W320 (14MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and W320 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Quattro was manufactured 6 years after the W320 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick overview of how the Quattro matches up vs the W320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The entire galleries are provided at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony W320
Quattro | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | January 2010 | More modern by 75 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Sigma Quattro
W320 | Quattro |
---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony W320
Quattro | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Sigma Quattro has got external measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony W320 has dimensions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Sigma Quattro and Sony W320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the Quattro and the W320.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Quattro and W320 is 63 and 97 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Quattro and W320.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Quattro featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Sigma Quattro will deliver greater detail due to its extra 15MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer Quattro will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W320 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Sigma | Sony |
Model type | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual TRUE III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 4cm |
Amount of lenses | 76 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,620 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 1 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.8 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.80 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 625 gr (1.38 lb) | 117 gr (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | BP-61 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $738 | $269 |