Clicky

Sony QX1 vs Sony W320

Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57
Sony Alpha QX1 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Sony QX1 vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Released September 2014
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sony QX1 vs Sony W320 Overview

Let's look closer at the Sony QX1 and Sony W320, one being a Lens-style and the other is a Ultracompact and they are both designed by Sony. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the QX1 (20MP) and W320 (14MP) and the QX1 (APS-C) and W320 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The QX1 was launched 4 years later than the W320 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a simple view of how the QX1 matches up vs the W320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Sony W320

 QX1 W320 
IntroducedSeptember 2014January 2010Fresher by 57 months
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Sony QX1

 W320 QX1 
Display dimension2.7""Larger display (+2.7")
Display resolution230k0kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Sony QX1 and Sony W320

 QX1 W320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Sony QX1 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Sony QX1 offers external measurements of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has specifications of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Examine the Sony QX1 and Sony W320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the QX1 compared to the W320.

Sony QX1 vs Sony W320 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the QX1 and W320 is 90 and 97 respectively.

Sony QX1 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Sony QX1 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing merely by checking out a spec sheet. The visual underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the QX1 and W320.

Clearly, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The QX1 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony QX1 will show extra detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern QX1 should have an edge in sensor technology.

Sony QX1 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Sony QX1 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Sony QX1 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sony QX1 Portrait photography features
Sony W320 Portrait photography features
66
focusing manually
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
no manual control
no external flash support
28
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Sony QX1 Street photography highlights
Sony W320 Street photography highlights
69
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
has touch focus
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
heavier than average in class (216g)
49
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sony QX1 Sports photography info
Sony W320 Sports photography info
56
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
better than average battery pack (440 per charge)
max fps low (4.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
26
MP count decent (14MP)
slow fps (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Sony QX1
Travel photography with Sony W320
71
better than average battery pack (440 per charge)
has touch focus
MP count good (20MP)
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (216g)
display isn't selfie friendly
66
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (26mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Sony QX1 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony W320 as a Landscape photography camera
64
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
better than average battery pack (440 per charge)
tiny screen ( inch)
no manual control
no image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse recording
33
pretty wide (26mm)
MP count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Sony QX1
Vlogging with Sony W320
32
touch screen
includes face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
lack of external mic jack
heavier than average in class (216g)
26
pretty wide (26mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sony QX1 vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony QX1 and Sony W320
 Sony Alpha QX1Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Manufacturer Sony Sony
Model type Sony Alpha QX1 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Type Lens-style Ultracompact
Released 2014-09-03 2010-01-07
Body design Lens-style Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Bionz X -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.2 x 15.4mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 357.3mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 5456 x 3632 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 16000 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mount type Sony E fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-105mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.7-5.7
Macro focusing distance - 4cm
Focal length multiplier 1.6 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal - 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 0k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 1 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.80 m
Flash modes Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 216g (0.48 lb) 117g (0.26 lb)
Dimensions 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 440 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-FW50 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2, 10 secs) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $500 $269