Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung MV800
69 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Revealed July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Launched September 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung MV800, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and MV800 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-FH25 was brought out 14 months earlier than the MV800 making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-FH25 grades versus the MV800 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Samsung MV800. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung MV800
| EX-FH25 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Casio EX-FH25
| MV800 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2011 |  | July 2010 | Newer by 14 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung MV800
| EX-FH25 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FH25 comes with outer dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Samsung MV800 has proportions of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung MV800 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-FH25 and the MV800.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and MV800 is 69 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by seeing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and MV800.
As you can see, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Samsung MV800 to produce more detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung MV800 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 pounds) | 121 gr (0.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Micro SD |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $450 | $499 |
