Clicky

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5010

Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front
 
Olympus FE-5010 front
Portability
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5010 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Launched January 2013
Olympus FE-5010
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5010 Overview

The following is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Olympus FE-5010, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and FE-5010 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The EX-ZR700 was unveiled 4 years after the FE-5010 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-ZR700 scores vs the FE-5010 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus FE-5010

          

          

            
 EX-ZR700 FE-5010 
RevealedJanuary 2013January 2009Newer by 50 months
Focus manually  Very precise focus
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution922k230kSharper screen (+692k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Casio EX-ZR700

          

          

            
 FE-5010 EX-ZR700 
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus FE-5010

          

          

            
 EX-ZR700 FE-5010 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Lacking Touch friendly screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5010 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
When you are looking to travel with your camera often, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR700 offers external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus FE-5010 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Olympus FE-5010 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR700 and the FE-5010.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5010 size comparison
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and FE-5010 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5010 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5010 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Usually, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions simply by seeing a spec sheet. The image underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR700 and FE-5010.
Clearly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR700 to show extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR700 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

            Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5010 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus FE-5010 Portrait photography highlights
43
 manual focus
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 has face detect focus
 cannot use external flash
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
20
 manual focus not available
 no manual exposure
 cannot use external flash
 MP count low (12 megapixels)
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Street Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Street photography with Olympus FE-5010
61
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competitors in class (222g)
 screen is fixed
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
66
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather proof
 lighter than others (130 grams)
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Sports Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR700 as a Sports photography camera
 Olympus FE-5010 as a Sports photography camera
50
 incredible zoom range (25-450mm  18.0 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 has tracking focus
 good battery life (470 shots)
 painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect auto focus
33
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather proof
 no shutter priority mode
 MP count low (12 megapixels)
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 does not have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Travel photography details
Olympus FE-5010 Travel photography details
70
 good battery life (470 CIPA)
 lighter than competitors in class (222g)
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 fairly wide (25mm)
 long reach (450mm)
 missing Time Lapse recording
 display is not selfie friendly
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
60
 lighter than others (130 grams)
 weather proof
 flash built-in
 lack of Timelapse recording
 MP count low (12 megapixels)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 wide angle not good (36mm)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Landscape photography features
Olympus FE-5010 Landscape photography features
51
 manual focus
 fairly wide (25mm)
 pretty good screen size (3")
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 good battery life (470 CIPA)
 can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
 missing Time Lapse recording
31
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather proof
 manual focus not available
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not good (36mm)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 tiny screen (2.7 inches)
 no manual exposure
 MP count low (12 megapixels)
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW files
 lack of Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Vlogging advice
Olympus FE-5010 Vlogging advice
34
 fairly wide (25mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 has face detect focus
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than competitors in class (222 grams)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
 display is not selfie friendly
 missing mic jack
28
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than others (130 grams)
 wide angle not good (36mm)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
 lack of microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
        
                
        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5010 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus FE-5010
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR700Olympus FE-5010
General Information
Make Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 Olympus FE-5010
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2013-01-29 2009-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor EXILIM Engine HS 3 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 64
RAW photos    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
Continuous autofocus    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Autofocus center weighted    
Autofocus multi area    
Live view autofocus    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-450mm (18.0x) 36-180mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus distance 5cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 922k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch capability    
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 4.70 m 4.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
External flash    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 222 gr (0.49 pounds) 130 gr (0.29 pounds)
Physical dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-130 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse recording    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required)
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $370 $130