Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB700
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced December 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB700, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR700 was brought out 2 years after the WB700 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-ZR700 matches up against the WB700 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Samsung WB700. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Samsung WB700
| EX-ZR700 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | December 2010 | More modern by 26 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 614k | Clearer display (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| WB700 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB700
| EX-ZR700 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 offers exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung WB700 has proportions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB700 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR700 versus the WB700.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and WB700 is 91 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by reading specifications. The image underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and WB700.
To sum up, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR700 to deliver extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB700 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2010-12-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $370 | $300 |