Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB700
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced December 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB700, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR700 was brought out 2 years after the WB700 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-ZR700 matches up against the WB700 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Samsung WB700. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Samsung WB700
| EX-ZR700 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | December 2010 | More modern by 26 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 614k | Clearer display (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| WB700 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB700
| EX-ZR700 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 offers exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung WB700 has proportions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB700 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR700 versus the WB700.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and WB700 is 91 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by reading specifications. The image underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and WB700.
To sum up, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR700 to deliver extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB700 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2010-12-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $370 | $300 |