Fujifilm XP60 vs Olympus 9000
93 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d769/7d76960df9d1c13dc669edbc8084200a6613c314" alt="Fujifilm FinePix XP60 front Fujifilm FinePix XP60 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cd55/6cd55e755b246a73ebaa42d5216b8beb3a328143" alt="Olympus Stylus 9000 front Olympus Stylus 9000 front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Fujifilm XP60 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 183g - 104 x 67 x 26mm
- Released June 2013
- Previous Model is Fujifilm XP50
- Replacement is Fujifilm XP70
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm XP60 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Fujifilm XP60 vs Olympus 9000, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XP60 (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The Fujifilm XP60 was announced 4 years later than the 9000 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the Fujifilm XP60 matches up vs the 9000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Fujifilm XP60 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP60 & Olympus Stylus 9000. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP60 Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP60 over the Olympus 9000
Fujifilm XP60 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2013 | ![]() | May 2009 | Fresher by 50 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Fujifilm XP60
9000 | Fujifilm XP60 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP60 and Olympus 9000
Fujifilm XP60 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal display dimensions |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Fujifilm XP60 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP60 provides outside dimensions of 104mm x 67mm x 26mm (4.1" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 183 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Fujifilm XP60 vs Olympus 9000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm XP60 compared to the 9000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20382/20382c5e14a88b0b80b86800936e7a5894ef3965" alt="Fujifilm XP60 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison Fujifilm XP60 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP60 and 9000 is 93 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93e2b/93e2bd5da910ef0aecf2a1de741ab437e0e3d0fb" alt="Fujifilm XP60 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm XP60 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm XP60 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading through technical specs. The graphic underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP60 and 9000.
As you have seen, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Fujifilm XP60 to give you more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XP60 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4ead/b4ead467f79d79e70613286e412f006857f48bed" alt="Fujifilm XP60 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison Fujifilm XP60 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm XP60 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00564/0056482517de4e45fac574149fa8629db581ac97" alt="Fujifilm XP60 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm XP60 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Fujifilm XP60 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix XP60 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP60 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Also Known as | - | mju 9000 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-06-21 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 183 grams (0.40 pounds) | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 67 x 26mm (4.1" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $180 | $300 |