Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
83 Imaging
68 Features
82 Overall
73
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 383g - 118 x 83 x 41mm
- Announced January 2017
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X-T10
- New Model is Fujifilm X-T30
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus SP-565UZ, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T20 (24MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the Fujifilm X-T20 (APS-C) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm X-T20 was unveiled 8 years later than the SP-565UZ and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm X-T20 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm X-T20 matches up vs the SP-565UZ with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-T20 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T20 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T20 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
Fujifilm X-T20 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2017 | January 2009 | Fresher by 98 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Fujifilm X-T20
SP-565UZ | Fujifilm X-T20 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T20 and Olympus SP-565UZ
Fujifilm X-T20 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-T20 enjoys outer measurements of 118mm x 83mm x 41mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 1.6") with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus SP-565UZ in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm X-T20 versus the SP-565UZ.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T20 and SP-565UZ is 83 and 72 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The visual here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-T20 and SP-565UZ.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-T20 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm X-T20 will give you extra detail having an extra 14MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X-T20 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Fujifilm X-T20 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X-T20 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2017-01-18 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | X-Processor Pro2 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS III | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 368.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 325 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 54 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 14.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (ISO 100) | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, slow synchro, flash off, rear-curtain synchro, commander | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1920 x 1080 (59.94p, 50p, 29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 383g (0.84 lb) | 413g (0.91 lb) |
Dimensions | 118 x 83 x 41mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 1.6") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-W126S | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (10sec. / 2sec. Delay) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $900 | $400 |