Clicky

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL2

Portability
77
Imaging
72
Features
35
Overall
57
Leica M Typ 262 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL2 front
Portability
85
Imaging
48
Features
47
Overall
47

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL2 Key Specs

Leica M Typ 262
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 6400
  • Leica M Mount
  • 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Revealed November 2015
  • Alternative Name is Typ 262
Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
  • Introduced February 2011
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-PL1s
  • New Model is Olympus E-PL3
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL2 Overview

Below is a in depth analysis of the Leica M Typ 262 versus Olympus E-PL2, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and E-PL2 (12MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-PL2 (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor sizing.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The M Typ 262 was released 4 years later than the E-PL2 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the M Typ 262 matches up vs the E-PL2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-PL2

 M Typ 262 E-PL2 
IntroducedNovember 2015February 2011More recent by 59 months
Screen resolution921k460kSharper screen (+461k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Leica M Typ 262

 E-PL2 M Typ 262 

Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL2

 M Typ 262 E-PL2 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurement
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL2 Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 262 enjoys outside dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL2 has sizing of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs).

Check out the Leica M Typ 262 versus Olympus E-PL2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the M Typ 262 and the E-PL2.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL2 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 262 and E-PL2 is 77 and 85 respectively.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL2 top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL2 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through specs. The photograph below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M Typ 262 and E-PL2.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 262 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Leica M Typ 262 will produce more detail as a result of its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger M Typ 262 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL2 sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-PL2 Portrait photography advice
75
you can focus manually
decent MP (24 megapixels)
great sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
no liveview feature
60
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
saves RAW formats
MP count low (12 megapixels)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Street photography info
Olympus E-PL2 Street photography info
66
great sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
73
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Sports photography details
Olympus E-PL2 Sports photography details
50
decent MP (24 megapixels)
great sensor size (Full frame)
no liveview feature
slow fps (3.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
45
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
low fps (3.0 fps)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
terrible battery (280 shots)
has no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Travel photography factors
Olympus E-PL2 Travel photography factors
58
decent MP (24 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
51
flash built-in
no Timelapse function
terrible battery (280 per charge)
MP count low (12MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-PL2 Landscape photography factors
69
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Leica M mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
decent MP (24 megapixels)
great sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
61
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
MP count low (12 megapixels)
terrible battery (280 CIPA)
no Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-PL2 as a Vlogging camera
22
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution ( pxls)
doesn't have external mic socket
29
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detection focus
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL2
 Leica M Typ 262Olympus PEN E-PL2
General Information
Brand Leica Olympus
Model type Leica M Typ 262 Olympus PEN E-PL2
Also Known as Typ 262 -
Type Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2015-11-19 2011-02-11
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Maestro Truepic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 35.8 x 23.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 855.6mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Full resolution 5952 x 3976 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mount type Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 921k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech - HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 10.00 m
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution - 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 600 gr (1.32 lbs) 362 gr (0.80 lbs)
Dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 55
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 21.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.2
DXO Low light rating not tested 573
Other
Battery life - 280 images
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID BP-SCL2 BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Retail cost $5,069 $0