Leica M8 vs Samsung NX2000
79 Imaging
50 Features
31 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6b05/e6b05f1a75a897fa036b2dc88e68a86633f750b7" alt="Leica M8 front Leica M8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d001/6d00199fa554daddf1699da91ea808290d954e81" alt="Samsung NX2000 front Samsung NX2000 front"
89 Imaging
63 Features
68 Overall
65
Leica M8 vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-H Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 2500
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 591g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Introduced July 2007
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Released November 2013
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX1100
- New Model is Samsung NX3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Leica M8 vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Leica M8 vs Samsung NX2000, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Leica and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the M8 (10MP) and NX2000 (20MP) and the M8 (APS-H) and NX2000 (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The M8 was released 7 years before the NX2000 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the M8 matches up versus the NX2000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Leica M8 vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M8 & Samsung NX2000. The complete galleries are provided at Leica M8 Gallery & Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M8 over the Samsung NX2000
M8 | NX2000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Leica M8
NX2000 | M8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2013 | ![]() | July 2007 | More recent by 77 months |
Display dimension | 3.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 1152k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+922k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M8 and Samsung NX2000
M8 | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Leica M8 vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Leica M8 has exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") with a weight of 591 grams (1.30 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX2000 has dimensions of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Leica M8 vs Samsung NX2000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the M8 and the NX2000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4043c/4043cb4d1afa3042a0dcaf9fb7968ed6d3e50ee5" alt="Leica M8 vs Samsung NX2000 size comparison Leica M8 vs Samsung NX2000 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M8 and NX2000 is 79 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cb34/1cb3497ce5525bc4f3e4d62261798dca903ee4c4" alt="Leica M8 vs Samsung NX2000 top view buttons comparison Leica M8 vs Samsung NX2000 top view buttons comparison"
Leica M8 vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements merely by looking at specifications. The visual here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the M8 and NX2000.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M8 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung NX2000 will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older M8 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd989/fd9897025465cb5f60660194db37730eba100491" alt="Leica M8 vs Samsung NX2000 sensor size comparison Leica M8 vs Samsung NX2000 sensor size comparison"
Leica M8 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/414e7/414e7cd787a1335db3ef9f90fe522293523da236" alt="Leica M8 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M8 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Leica M8 vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
Leica M8 | Samsung NX2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Samsung |
Model | Leica M8 | Samsung NX2000 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2007-07-31 | 2013-11-30 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-H | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 27 x 18mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 486.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3936 x 2630 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 2500 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 160 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | Samsung NX |
Total lenses | 59 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.3 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 591g (1.30 lbs) | 228g (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 59 | 75 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.1 | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | 663 | 908 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 550 images | 340 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $4,400 | $599 |