Nikon S3500 vs Ricoh WG-30
95 Imaging
44 Features
25 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fb47/6fb4741c1ece9d4e2892383c9481555b7f4a8fd0" alt="Nikon Coolpix S3500 front Nikon Coolpix S3500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b2c4/4b2c48a59424bf7e9398646eaf9b305a09be3d25" alt="Ricoh WG-30 front Ricoh WG-30 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Nikon S3500 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-182mm (F3.4-6.4) lens
- 129g - 97 x 58 x 21mm
- Released February 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched October 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Nikon S3500 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Nikon S3500 vs Ricoh WG-30, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the S3500 (20MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The S3500 was launched 19 months earlier than the WG-30 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the S3500 scores vs the WG-30 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Nikon S3500 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S3500 & Ricoh WG-30. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon S3500 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S3500 over the Ricoh WG-30
S3500 | WG-30 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Nikon S3500
WG-30 | S3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2014 | ![]() | February 2013 | More modern by 19 months |
Common features in the Nikon S3500 and Ricoh WG-30
S3500 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Nikon S3500 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Nikon S3500 has got external measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S3500 vs Ricoh WG-30 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the S3500 vs the WG-30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a8b1/4a8b18c19ed5e12fa893623e75590765a032a1ed" alt="Nikon S3500 vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison Nikon S3500 vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S3500 and WG-30 is 95 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2595b/2595bd8a2d9ebc3e38cf458ad170ae1b08f12d0e" alt="Nikon S3500 vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison Nikon S3500 vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison"
Nikon S3500 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by viewing technical specs. The pic below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the S3500 and WG-30.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Nikon S3500 to result in extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged S3500 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2feaf/2feaf0ed092b4fe901abc1033ab17c15ce918fa8" alt="Nikon S3500 vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison Nikon S3500 vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison"
Nikon S3500 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86cd5/86cd5e6ca808fdffa0bceedec87e65566956e209" alt="Nikon S3500 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S3500 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Nikon S3500 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S3500 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Ricoh |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S3500 | Ricoh WG-30 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2013-02-21 | 2014-10-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5152 x 3864 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-182mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.4-6.4 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 129 gr (0.28 lbs) | 192 gr (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 97 x 58 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $85 | $428 |