Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Introduced March 2006
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-330
- Superseded the Olympus E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Revealed March 2016
- Older Model is Sony RX10 II
- Later Model is Sony RX10 IV
Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-330 versus Sony RX10 III, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and RX10 III (1") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-330 was manufactured 11 years earlier than the RX10 III and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-330 scores vs the RX10 III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-330 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony RX10 III
E-330 | RX10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus E-330
RX10 III | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2016 | March 2006 | Fresher by 122 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 215k | Clearer display (+1014k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony RX10 III
E-330 | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 comes with physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") with a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-330 versus Sony RX10 III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-330 and the RX10 III.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and RX10 III is 65 and 53 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching specifications. The visual here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and RX10 III.
Plainly, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-330 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony RX10 III will render extra detail due to its extra 13 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos far more aggressively. The older E-330 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Alternative name | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2006-03-18 | 2016-03-29 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 215k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 616 grams (1.36 pounds) | 1051 grams (2.32 pounds) |
Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $1,100 | $1,398 |