Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
52
Features
77
Overall
62

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Introduced March 2006
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Superseded the Olympus E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-450
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Revealed March 2016
  • Older Model is Sony RX10 II
  • Later Model is Sony RX10 IV
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-330 versus Sony RX10 III, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and RX10 III (1") possess totally different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-330 was manufactured 11 years earlier than the RX10 III and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-330 scores vs the RX10 III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony RX10 III

 E-330 RX10 III 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus E-330

 RX10 III E-330 
RevealedMarch 2016March 2006Fresher by 122 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1229k215kClearer display (+1014k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony RX10 III

 E-330 RX10 III 
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 comes with physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") with a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-330 versus Sony RX10 III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-330 and the RX10 III.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and RX10 III is 65 and 53 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching specifications. The visual here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and RX10 III.

Plainly, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-330 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony RX10 III will render extra detail due to its extra 13 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos far more aggressively. The older E-330 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-330
Portrait photography with Sony RX10 III
54
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
megapixel count low (7MP)
71
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
good sensor size (1")
provides face detection focus
saves RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Street photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Street photography camera
60
tilting screen
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (616g)
no image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
64
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good sensor size (1")
saves RAW formats
weather proofing
more heavy than average in class (1,051g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography info
Sony RX10 III Sports photography info
40
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (7 megapixels)
70
great zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
good sensor size (1")
provides tracking autofocus
weather proofing
good battery (420 CIPA)
no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Travel photography camera
50
lighter than competition in class (616 grams)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse function
megapixel count low (7 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
55
good battery (420 per charge)
weather proofing
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
great reach (600mm)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than average in class (1,051 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.4)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-330
Landscape photography with Sony RX10 III
45
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (7MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
lack of Timelapse function
63
focusing manually
pretty wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (1")
saves RAW formats
weather proofing
good battery (420 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.4)
no Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Vlogging camera
Sony RX10 III as a Vlogging camera
9
no video
28
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
includes external microphone support
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.4)
screen is not selfie friendly
more heavy than average in class (1,051 grams)
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-330 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony RX10 III
 Olympus E-330Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-330 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Alternative name EVOLT E-330 -
Class Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2006-03-18 2016-03-29
Physical type Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3136 x 2352 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 400 12800
Highest boosted ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW pictures
Minimum boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-600mm (25.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.4-4.0
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 2.7
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen sizing 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 215k dots 1,229k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Maximum silent shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 14.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution None 3840x2160
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616 grams (1.36 pounds) 1051 grams (2.32 pounds)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 70
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 472
Other
Battery life - 420 shots
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $1,100 $1,398