Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FZ35
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08139/081398bcc0c8f94f2393a10fc9ce1710425f2ed3" alt="Olympus E-450 front Olympus E-450 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/708ca/708ca63198576f0ffc46689e66eb690a812d18d4" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front"
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced March 2009
- Old Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Released July 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FZ38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FZ35, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-450 (10MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is pretty well matched but the E-450 (Four Thirds) and FZ35 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-450 was launched 15 months before the FZ35 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-450 scores versus the FZ35 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-450 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-450 Gallery & Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Panasonic FZ35
E-450 | FZ35 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus E-450
FZ35 | E-450 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2010 | ![]() | March 2009 | Fresher by 15 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Panasonic FZ35
E-450 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-450 comes with external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ35 has measurements of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") having a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FZ35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-450 against the FZ35.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a707/8a707a6174ccd7c6f6b657d2d2e258346a4ea344" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-450 and FZ35 is 77 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a49a/4a49ae8c2600184065253af2f72fc3e793fbdc72" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through technical specs. The visual underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-450 and FZ35.
As you can tell, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-450 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FZ35 will give more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older E-450 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e003b/e003bf034151328b0ded3365e723efc5e12d20ca" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb3c0/cb3c0264e7c06ead4699b9289bf9f6a164ed80b2" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Olympus E-450 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-450 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-03-31 | 2010-07-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 lb) | 397g (0.88 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 512 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $138 | $999 |