Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GX850
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
90 Imaging
55 Features
70 Overall
61
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GX850 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Successor is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 107 x 65 x 33mm
- Released January 2017
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-GX800 / Lumix DMC-GF9
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GX850 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GX850, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the GX850 (16MP) is very comparable but the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and GX850 (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SP-800 UZ was introduced 8 years earlier than the GX850 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GX850 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the SP-800 UZ scores versus the GX850 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GX850 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Panasonic GX850 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Panasonic GX850
SP-800 UZ | GX850 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX850 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
GX850 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2017 | February 2010 | Newer by 84 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Panasonic GX850
SP-800 UZ | GX850 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GX850 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-800 UZ comes with outer measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Panasonic GX850 has proportions of 107mm x 65mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GX850 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the SP-800 UZ vs the GX850.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and GX850 is 69 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GX850 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-800 UZ and GX850.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SP-800 UZ using its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic GX850 will provide more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GX850 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GX850 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-GX800 / Lumix DMC-GF9 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2017-01-04 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4592 x 3448 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1000 | - |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 12s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/500s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 17 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 20 Mbps, MP4, H.264 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455 gr (1.00 pounds) | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 107 x 65 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 586 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 210 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2, 10 sec, 3 images/10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $270 | $548 |