Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX3
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Updated by Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX3, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and CX3 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-860 was manufactured 4 years later than the CX3 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the TG-860 grades vs the CX3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 and Ricoh CX3. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-860 Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Ricoh CX3
| TG-860 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 57 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Olympus TG-860
| CX3 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Ricoh CX3
| TG-860 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-860 has exterior dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-860 and the CX3.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-860 and CX3 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-860 and CX3.
As you can tell, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-860 to render extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher TG-860 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2015-02-06 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Yes | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 224 grams (0.49 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $279 | $329 |