Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01ae1/01ae1246b008c2c1438d02f27195e5dcd053dfef" alt="Olympus TG-610 front Olympus TG-610 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus TG-610 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the TG-610 (14MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly well matched but the TG-610 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") boast different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The TG-610 was brought out 23 months prior to the XZ-2 iHS making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the TG-610 matches up against the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-610 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-610 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TG-610 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus TG-610
XZ-2 iHS | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 23 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-610 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TG-610 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-610 offers outside dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-610 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-610 versus the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70938/70938ed986d6c09ef4fad686f2312cd8783a44a8" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-610 and XZ-2 iHS is 93 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07349/0734945ba352728b4c0669d3e44b34e2eb705605" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading through technical specs. The photograph here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-610 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-610 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus TG-610 will give greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older TG-610 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2a69/a2a69de3e5cff5d0315e5c6e14b62cf830da3427" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eaf37/eaf376c71fc162ca2e4d2f2b70e8842c2ff95834" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus TG-610 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus TG-610 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-01-06 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.20 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 shots | 340 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $223 | $450 |