Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic FZ200
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
65 Imaging
35 Features
64 Overall
46
Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Introduced July 2012
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Later Model is Panasonic FZ300
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-610 versus Panasonic FZ200, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-610 (14MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is pretty close and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-610 was revealed 18 months before the FZ200 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-610 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the TG-610 scores versus the FZ200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-610 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-610 Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Panasonic FZ200
| TG-610 | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus TG-610
| FZ200 | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2012 | January 2011 | More recent by 18 months | |
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-610 and Panasonic FZ200
| TG-610 | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-610 features outer dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") having a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-610 versus Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-610 vs the FZ200.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the TG-610 and FZ200 is 93 and 65 respectively.
Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching a spec sheet. The graphic here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-610 and FZ200.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus TG-610 to render greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The older TG-610 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
| Olympus TG-610 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus TG-610 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-01-06 | 2012-07-18 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine VII FHD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 23 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 12.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 13.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) | 588 gr (1.30 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 37 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photos | 540 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $223 | $499 |