Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX500
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49


87 Imaging
67 Features
80 Overall
72
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 287g - 120 x 64 x 43mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Previous Model is Samsung NX300

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX500 Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung NX500, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and NX500 (28MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and NX500 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.

The XZ-2 iHS was manufactured 3 years earlier than the NX500 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX500 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the NX500 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung NX500. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung NX500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung NX500
XZ-2 iHS | NX500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX500 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
NX500 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2015 | ![]() | December 2012 | Newer by 26 months |
Screen resolution | 1036k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+116k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung NX500
XZ-2 iHS | NX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX500 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX500 has sizing of 120mm x 64mm x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 287 grams (0.63 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung NX500 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the NX500.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and NX500 is 85 and 87 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The picture below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and NX500.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Samsung NX500 will give more detail due to its extra 16MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX500 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung NX500 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung NX500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung NX500 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | DRIMe 5 |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 28 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6480 x 4320 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 209 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 1,036k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Smart flash, auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill flash, fill w/redeye reduction, 1st-curtain, 2nd-curtain, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.265 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 287 gr (0.63 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 120 x 64 x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | 87 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 24.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 13.9 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 1379 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 370 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $450 | $800 |