Samsung TL320 vs Sony RX100 VI
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34


88 Imaging
53 Features
75 Overall
61
Samsung TL320 vs Sony RX100 VI Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternative Name is WB1000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 301g - 102 x 58 x 43mm
- Revealed June 2018
- Succeeded the Sony RX100 V
- Successor is Sony RX100 VII

Samsung TL320 vs Sony RX100 VI Overview
Below, we are looking at the Samsung TL320 and Sony RX100 VI, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the TL320 (12MP) and RX100 VI (20MP) and the TL320 (1/2.3") and RX100 VI (1") come with different sensor size.

The TL320 was brought out 10 years earlier than the RX100 VI and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony RX100 VI being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the TL320 matches up vs the RX100 VI in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung TL320 vs Sony RX100 VI Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung TL320 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung TL320 Gallery and Sony RX100 VI Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Sony RX100 VI
TL320 | RX100 VI |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 VI over the Samsung TL320
RX100 VI | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2018 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 112 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+769k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung TL320 and Sony RX100 VI
TL320 | RX100 VI | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Samsung TL320 vs Sony RX100 VI Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Samsung TL320 comes with outside measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony RX100 VI has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 43mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.7") with a weight of 301 grams (0.66 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung TL320 and Sony RX100 VI in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the TL320 against the RX100 VI.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TL320 and RX100 VI is 98 and 88 respectively.

Samsung TL320 vs Sony RX100 VI Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by researching a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TL320 and RX100 VI.
As you can see, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TL320 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony RX100 VI will provide you with greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older TL320 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Samsung TL320 vs Sony RX100 VI Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung TL320 vs Sony RX100 VI Specifications
Samsung TL320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung TL320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI |
Also Known as | WB1000 | - |
Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-02-23 | 2018-06-05 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.8 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 8cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 24.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 5.90 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 301g (0.66 lb) |
Dimensions | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 43mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $380 | $1,198 |