Photographer fined ‘$200,000’ for failing to deliver photos

Must Read

Unsplash partners with Institutions to bring historical archive photos

Unsplash is not without controversy. Many photographers do not like the way it doesn't seem to offer any protection...

Use ‘AI’ to make ‘artificial’ photos

Deleting objects from our photos has been commonplace for a while. There isn't much you can't 'paint' away in...

Canon EOS R5 leaks heating up

The canon leaks never seem to stop. There are new reports coming out that Canon is gearing up to...

Don’t destroy your film at airport security

As security gets tighter at airports around the world, the photography community has constantly been worried about what modern...

Fuji’s ‘cheap’ 35mm finally here

Fujifilm has just added a third 35mm lens for its X mount system. The XC 35mm f/2 follows the...

Arkansas Times is reporting a Judgement on a photographer who has been fined $200,000 for not delivering photos to clients as agreed.

The photographer was charging clients upfront which is normal in the industry – but as many as 54 people complained to the Attorney General of Arkansas after they never received the service they paid for.

The services offered by the photographer included event photography and newborn baby portraits. Customers were charged as much as $2,000 for sessions with all the money taken upfront. It seems that the photographer in this case never carried out the photography sessions and decided to keep all the money and issue no refunds.

Photographs of some of life’s most precious events will finally be given to their rightful owners where they can be appreciated and shared,” said Rutledge in a prepared statement. “Arkansans who pay for photography services at their weddings or other special events expect to get what they pay for, but companies like Jonathan Funk Photography who act dishonestly will not be tolerated in Arkansas.

Once the case went to court, the judge ordered Jonathan to pay $98,625 in restitution, $100,000 in civil penalties, and $1,135 in filing fees and service costs. He was also ordered to turn over Hard Drives containing images for the sessions he did photograph. He was charged under the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Trendingthe week